Revision [3755]
This is an old revision of IndependentWikkaReviews made by JavaWoman on 2004-12-27 15:06:45.
Opinions about Wikka
Reviews
This is a list of opinions taken from independent WikkaWiki reviews.
[2004-12-21]
Wakka had a few limitations of its own, such as relying on the tab character with no practical way of using it, lack of strike through text, lack of source code highlighting, lack of tables, etc. I also realized that Wakka had officially stopped development in March 2004, which spawned a whole slew of forks.
[...] After perusing through the list, Wikka Wiki stood out as containing a number of new features while adhering to Wakka's simplistic UI. Best of all, it comes with a javascript-based editor that can be used to apply formatting, lists, links, etc to your document. A few other notable features over Wakka include inline images, built-in search, and source code highlighting.
[2004-10-14]
One of the absolute plusses of (...) WikkaWiki is that it is possible to dynamically include Freemind mindmaps, keeping them clickable and all. This (...) beats Freeminds basic HTML-export handily by offering you the real thing.
[2004-09-08]
[Der] vielleicht wichtigste Nachfolger der legendären Wiki-Engine WakkaWiki
[2004-09-07]
Wikka is a very promising lightweight but still immature wiki engine that can power small wikis quickly and efficiently. After it matures, it could become a serious competitor to other more known wiki engines.
[2004-09-03]
WikkaWiki — Developed by Jason Tourtelotte is a very nice wiki engine, standards-compliant, feature-rich wakka fork. Probably the best around.
[2004-08-11]
De wiki hier gebruikt op het moment WikkaWiki. De reden daarvoor is dat de code daarvan netter gebleven is. En gezien het aantal aanpassingen dat er toch gemaakt wordt in de code is dat wel zo handig.
[2004-07-19]
[Nous] avons particulièrement apprécié l’éditeur (compatible IE mais surtout Mozilla), la possibilité de créer facilement des catégories et la présence d’un fil XML-RSS des modifications.
More on Wikka
Feedback from users
If you are using Wikka and want to tell us your opinion about it, just add it here.
- Kudos! Excellent software!
I wanted to add some functionality to my WakkaWiki site, but found that they disappeared. Upgrading to Wikka gave me all the features that I wanted, and a bunch more.
Good job all!
(Jeff)
- Wikka is the best ever. Keep up the good work! ;)
- We were wondering for a long time where WakkaWiki.com went.
Now we found Jason Tourtelotte, who started Wikka.
Wikka is what WakkaWiki should have been, he says. Good job!
(Bas)
- Take a look at Wikka Wiki: http://wikka.jsnx.com/HomePage . It's simple and fast. I had little trouble figuring out how to extend it. It is database backed, though.
(Richard)
- I think Wikka is the best Wiki out there.
(Richard Berg at http://episteme.arstechnica.com/)
- Wacko has some features that Wikka doesn't. The thing I miss most (probably the only thing I miss) is a Dutch interface.
But Wikka is still actively being developed, bugs are being fixed etc.
The lack of that was the main reason for me to move from Wakka.
The PHP-code of Wikka stays closer to the way the original Wakka code has been written and I find that (personal opinion) code easier to understand than the Wacko code.
(Pierre)
- If i had to describe the purpose of my own wiki, i would tell you, that it is absolutely not necessary, maybe useless, but it is a great toy and I like to play with this piece of code.
My first try with a Wiki was the WakkaWiki, the next logical step was to change to Wikka. And so i did.
(SorCerer)
CategoryWikka