Revision [3559]
This is an old revision of IndependentWikkaReviews made by DarTar on 2004-12-21 09:31:22.
Opinions about Wikka
This is a list of opinions taken from independent WikkaWiki reviews.
[2004-10-14]
One of the absolute plusses of (...) WikkaWiki is that it is possible to dynamically include Freemind mindmaps, keeping them clickable and all. This (...) beats Freeminds basic HTML-export handily by offering you the real thing.
[2004-09-08]
[Der] vielleicht wichtigste Nachfolger der legendären Wiki-Engine WakkaWiki
[2004-09-07]
Wikka is a very promising lightweight but still immature wiki engine that can power small wikis quickly and efficiently. After it matures, it could become a serious competitor to other more known wiki engines.
[2004-09-03]
WikkaWiki — Developed by Jason Tourtelotte is a very nice wiki engine, standards-compliant, feature-rich wakka fork. Probably the best around.
[2004-07-19]
[Nous] avons particulièrement apprécié l’éditeur (compatible IE mais surtout Mozilla), la possibilité de créer facilement des catégories et la présence d’un fil XML-RSS des modifications.
Feedback from users
If you are using Wikka and want to tell us your opinion about it, just add it here.
- Kudos! Excellent software!
I wanted to add some functionality to my WakkaWiki site, but found that they disappeared. Upgrading to Wikka gave me all the features that I wanted, and a bunch more.
Good job all!
(Jeff)
- Wikka is the best ever. Keep up the good work! ;)
- We were wondering for a long time where WakkaWiki.com went.
Now we found Jason Tourtelotte, who started Wikka.
Wikka is what WakkaWiki should have been, he says. Good job!
(Bas)
- Take a look at Wikka Wiki: http://wikka.jsnx.com/HomePage . It's simple and fast. I had little trouble figuring out how to extend it. It is database backed, though.
(Richard)
- I think Wikka is the best Wiki out there.
(Richard Berg at http://episteme.arstechnica.com/)
- Wacko has some features that Wikka doesn't. The thing I miss most (probably the only thing I miss) is a Dutch interface.
But Wikka is still actively being developed, bugs are being fixed etc.
The lack of that was the main reason for me to move from Wakka.
The PHP-code of Wikka stays closer to the way the original Wakka code has been written and I find that (personal opinion) code easier to understand than the Wacko code.
(Pierre)
- If i had to describe the purpose of my own wiki, i would tell you, that it is absolutely not necessary, maybe useless, but it is a great toy and I like to play with this piece of code.
My first try with a Wiki was the WakkaWiki, the next logical step was to change to Wikka. And so i did.
(SorCerer)
CategoryWikka