Revision history for WikkaFutureSuggestions
Revision [23455]
Last edited on 2016-05-20 07:38:48 by GeorgePetsagourakis [Replaces old-style internal links with new pipe-split links.]Additions:
- implement [[www.wikicreole.org | WikiCreole wiki syntax]] as the default wiki syntax (with minor additions for custom needs),
Deletions:
Revision [21229]
Edited on 2010-06-29 03:15:52 by GeorgePetsagourakis [Replaces old-style internal links with new pipe-split links.]Additions:
Please do check WikkaFutureCoreInteractions
Revision [21227]
Edited on 2010-06-28 23:42:13 by GeorgePetsagourakis [Replaces old-style internal links with new pipe-split links.]Additions:
I noticed that a sourceforge project already exists, good, although crippled badly.
Appearing active from within sourceforge can help push the exposure to potential developers and users.
Lets make sure that Wikka gets the most out of it.
Move the SVN there, move the bug tracker there (they can too host a Trac), setup the webhosting facility, so that can be done.
Appearing active from within sourceforge can help push the exposure to potential developers and users.
Lets make sure that Wikka gets the most out of it.
Move the SVN there, move the bug tracker there (they can too host a Trac), setup the webhosting facility, so that can be done.
Deletions:
Revision [21226]
Edited on 2010-06-28 23:41:46 by GeorgePetsagourakis [comment on sourceforge project]Additions:
- Move to Git (gitorious.org, github.com, sourceforge.com)
===After notes===
I noticed that a sourceforge project already exists, good, although crippled badly. Appearing active from within sourceforge can help push the exposure to potential developers and users. Lets make sure that Wikka gets the most out of it. Move the SVN there, move the bug tracker there (they can too host a Trac), setup the webhosting facility, so that can be done.
===After notes===
I noticed that a sourceforge project already exists, good, although crippled badly. Appearing active from within sourceforge can help push the exposure to potential developers and users. Lets make sure that Wikka gets the most out of it. Move the SVN there, move the bug tracker there (they can too host a Trac), setup the webhosting facility, so that can be done.
Deletions:
Revision [21224]
Edited on 2010-06-28 14:19:12 by GeorgePetsagourakis [comment on sourceforge project]Additions:
I gave MediaWiki a try and I (still find) found it too cumbersome and requiring too much activity and moderation for a community to have a proper wiki with it.
Deletions:
Revision [21223]
Edited on 2010-06-28 14:18:48 by GeorgePetsagourakis [comment on sourceforge project]Additions:
The separation of the wikkawiki content and the documentation is a good move, done in a bad way.
In general there needs to be a good way to clean up all the information of the wikkawiki site and just keep what is valid and up to date.
In my opinion:
- www.wikkawiki.org should give wikka related information (history, markup, requirements,...),
- docs.wikkawiki.org should give the wikka how to information
- code.wikkawiki.org should give the developers information,
- dev.wikkawiki.org should point to the development site.
In general there needs to be a good way to clean up all the information of the wikkawiki site and just keep what is valid and up to date.
In my opinion:
- www.wikkawiki.org should give wikka related information (history, markup, requirements,...),
- docs.wikkawiki.org should give the wikka how to information
- code.wikkawiki.org should give the developers information,
- dev.wikkawiki.org should point to the development site.
